No. 2 - Which Oil is Better - Synthetic or Castor?
|(The following is the second in a series of
articles exploring all facets of model engine fuel. The writer is Don Nix, founder and
former owner of POWERMASTER FUEL. Readers are invited to contact Don directly via e-mail [email protected] and to visit his website at http://www.rcauctioneer.com.)
Before we get started on the subject heading, Id like to offer a couple more thoughts on last months subject, "Whats the Oil Content?" - thoughts that have been remembered since writing the original column:
Many modelers who have been involved in the hobby for a long time, including those whove been away for years and recently returned, are very stubbornly remembering when model fuel just about had to contain something in the order of 25% oil - usually all-castor - and have a hard time dealing with the idea that virtually no one runs that much any more in modern engines.
The operative word here, of course, is "modern." The metallurgy in todays engines barely resembles that of a generation ago. The end result, as far as model engines are concerned, is that the engines today simply dont require as much lubricant - not nearly as much. I will be quick to add that those running antique engines in Old Timer events should certainly continue to use the old-time formulas - no doubt about it.
In addition to vastly improved metallurgy, we must remember than manufacturing techniques barely resemble those from years ago, in many ways. Modern CNC machinery has made it possible to routinely and cheaply make 1 or 1 million parts all exactly alike.
Those of you who have come along in later years may be shocked to know that up until the advent of this new technology, every piston was hand fitted to every liner. There was no such thing as simply machining 1,000 pistons and 1,000 sleeves, picking one from each batch and having them fit.
The belief in those days that some engines of the same size and make were markedly hotter than others was no doubt true. Weve read that in those days, a .29 for example, might vary from as low as an actual .26 to a .32 - some 23% more displacement! More closely controlled tolerances have resulted in the ability to use much different fuels than a generation ago.
The second thought on the subject of total oil content came from reading the operating instructions included with a new imported 4-stroke engine - the DAMO FS 218 twin. It recommends a fuel containing 94% methanol, 5% nitro and 1% Castor Oil! Clearly, this reinforces my point that "there aint no such thing as a fixed percentage of oil content." Now .on to this months subject:
Before we depart the subject of oil in model fuel, lets talk about a point thats argued vehemently all over the land - Which kind of oil is better - synthetic or castor?
Each side has its very strong proponents, and each side is right .to a point. "Old-timers" tend to still favor an all-castor fuel, or at least one containing a liberal amount of castor oil. Modelers who have come to the hobby in the last 15 or 20 years have a strong affection to synthetic oils, or at least want their fuel to have mostly synthetics. Lets take a look at both types statistically:
Id like to insert here that there is a "Chicken Little The Sky Is Falling" rumor making the rounds of the Internet these days that the manufacturers of castor oil have recently changed their methods of making the product, and the castor oil we are getting now is either wholly or partially incompatible with methanol.
I have talked at some length with the "Head Techie" of one of the largest castor oil importers in the U.S., and I want to go on record as saying that, according to the best information I can find, This is total B.S. The Head Techie actually laughed out loud when I told him what was going around. He said, "You know, there isnt much we do to the stuff. We press the oil out, filter it, grade it and package it. As far as I know, nothing has changed." It apparently started with one of the fuel manufacturers. For what reason, I have no idea, unless its to help them promote their proprietary synthetics. (Incidentally, I have read a response on the net from SIG, agreeing with the fact that its nonsense.)
So ..there you have it. "You pays your money and takes your choice." Actually, its a little better than that, and the obvious answer is - use a combination of the two, in proportions that will come nearest to enjoying the benefits of each, while minimizing the adverse characteristics.
A few years back, the modeling community was in a "synthetic oil frenzy," and the swing was toward all-synthetic fuels. Happily - at least in this writers opinion, weve seen a very noticeable swing back toward the center, with the majority seeming to prefer a synthetic/castor blend. We think this makes sense, and many years experience proves it.
The most frequent comment I hear from lovers of all-synthetic fuels is, "Brand XX leaves a lot less oil on my model." My response to that is, "Doesnt that bother you? If you dont see much oil on your model after flying, that tells you one of two things - or both: Either there wasnt enough oil in there in the first place, or the oil is burning off with the methanol. Neither is good. Theres no way oil can burn off and properly lubricate at the same time." This is usually met with a puzzled look, then one of the light dawning, having just realized something they never thought of before.
Oil residue in model engines is a natural as barking is to a dog. We have to learn to live with it.
As an aside, not long back a friend sent me a copy of an article published in a European model magazine. In one part, the writer stated, "The Americans are the only ones rich enough and dumb enough to use synthetic oils." Perhaps overstated just a bit, but it has some validity.
There a couple of types of engines that do require an all-castor fuel, or at least one with a considerably higher castor content than most others. One would be the Fox ringed iron piston type, and the other would be the small Cox engines, because of their rather unique ball-and-socket connecting rod-to-piston design.
Pattern flyers traditionally prefer an all-synthetic fuel, for a couple of reasons, I think. One is the fact that pattern flyers practice a lot - hour after hour after hour. That much use, plus the tuned pipe setup that is almost universal with them probably, tends to cause a greater problem with varnish and carbon buildup than in sport types. (At the risk of bombarded, I also think its largely a state of mind. "Joe Champion uses all-synthetic, so thats what Im going to use.")
The other area where we have seen all-synthetic fuels gain in popularity in recent years has been with model helicopters, probably for the same reasons. Also, the trend toward 30% nitro fuel for serious competition has led to using a lower viscosity lubricant, and, as shown in the comparison charts above, this necessarily dictates using synthetics.